Skip to content
Blog

Safety Management System (SMS): The Rulebook Every Ship Runs On

What a safety management system is in shipping: the ISM Code framework of procedures, drills, audits and the DPA that turns safety from intention into system.

Marine Insight 360· Published · Updated · 4 min read
What Is the Safety Management System SMS?
What Is the Safety Management System SMS?

A safety management system, or SMS, is the set of policies, procedures and checklists a shipping company uses to manage safety at sea. The ISM Code requires every company to have one, and it has to be written down and open to audit.

The rule grew out of disaster. In 1987 the Herald of Free Enterprise capsized with a bow door left open, and 193 people died. The inquiry blamed the company's management more than the crew. The ISM Code was the industry's response: companies now have to show, in their documents and in audits, how they run their ships safely.

What the system contains

Every SMS starts with company policies on safety, the environment, and drugs and alcohol. Below those sit step-by-step procedures for shipboard work, from bunkering to enclosed space entry to preparing for heavy weather, and the checklists and permits that make crews carry out critical steps in the right order.

It also holds emergency plans for fire, flooding, grounding and man overboard, each with assigned roles and a drill schedule, and a planned maintenance system with records tied to a list of critical equipment. Finally, it covers reporting and review: near-miss and non-conformity reports, internal audits, and an annual management review that feeds lessons back into the procedures.

The people and certificates behind it

Two certificates show the system exists. The company holds a Document of Compliance (DOC), and each ship carries a Safety Management Certificate (SMC). The flag state or its recognized organization issues both after an audit.

Ashore, the Code requires a Designated Person Ashore (DPA). The DPA is a named person with direct access to top management, and any crew member can contact them about a safety concern without going through the commercial chain. This is the Code's most useful idea, because it gives the crew someone to call who does not answer to the people worried about the schedule.

How the crew meets it day to day

Crew members first meet the SMS as familiarization when they join, then as checklists before critical jobs, as scheduled drills, and as reports after something goes wrong or nearly does. A good SMS reads as though people who have done the work wrote it, with procedures short enough for a tired third engineer to follow at three in the morning. A poor one reads as though it was written for auditors, and crews notice at once.

The paperwork is a real burden, and many companies are now moving their systems online and cutting them down while trying to keep the discipline.

Audits, port state control and the cost of failure

Internal audits check the system every year, and external audits renew the certificates every five years, with an intermediate check in between. Port state control officers in the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe test whether the system works in practice. They might ask a rating to start a fire pump or ask the mate to explain how a permit works.

A detention for ISM failures is one of the most serious findings a ship can receive, because it says the management system exists only on paper. Charterers and insurers read those records, so a weak system loses a company business as well as reputation.

Where systems fail in practice

Auditors and port state officers keep finding the same preventable weaknesses. Procedures fall out of date after a ship changes trade or equipment, until the manual describes a crane the vessel no longer has. Drills get signed off in minutes without running a hose or swinging out a boat. Near-miss reporting dries up once crews learn that reports bring blame instead of fixes, and the system loses its early warnings.

Rest-hour records get filled in to look compliant while the work carries on, and inspectors treat that falsification far more seriously than they would have treated the fatigue. Critical maintenance also slips, while the planned maintenance system builds up overdue jobs that nobody raises.

In each case the paperwork looks fine while the practice decays. Good companies audit the ship as it actually is, walk the deck with the checklist, and treat an honest non-conformity report as the system doing its job. An experienced inspector can usually tell which kind of company they are dealing with within an hour of boarding.

What to do next

The SMS governs the machinery and routines covered in these guides:

Recommended Reading